I am assuming you have Zotero and Zotero connecor installed in your browser. PCI uses a bit unusual reference style, but you can import it to Zotero. First, download this csl file (if it opens in a new brower tab, just right click and “Save Page as …”). Then open Zotero and go Preferences -> Cite -> “Styles” tab. Finally, click on the small “+” and add there the downloaded .csl file. Now you have created a new reference style for Zotero.
Then in Google docs, you will be able to add all the citations (by clicking on the small Z within the Google doc menu panel). This is something you already know if you used Zotero in Google Docs before.
and finally set “PCI reference style” as the reference style in the “Zotero - Document Preferences”
Done. Now your preprint should be PCI-formated. The only part I did not figure out was, how to make the DOI in the reference list a web-link, so people can click on it directly (something PCI asks you to do), I guess the best I can suggest is to finalize the references in the very end by making the links links manually at the very very end before submission. However, I hate manual solutions, so if someone can think of a better way, I am happy to hear about it!
Conclusion
PCI is great, and we should not waste this opportunity to heal academic publishing. They make a great deal of effort to make the platform as friendly as possible to everyone and now that there are Google docs templates, there is nothing that stands between your manuscripts and this awesome initiative :-).
Once per while there is a new way how to do things and speed up computations in the world of kmer genomics. Sometimes the tricks are simply more efficient algorithms, but sometimes the tricks are shortcuts that don’t do excatly the same thing. Here I would like to dig a bit in the relatively new k-mer counter FastK and compare it with my personal favourite KMC. If you are wondering if it is worth learning new tool, this blogpost might be able to help you make your mind.
Few days ago, the world learned about two California condor chicks that were products of parthenogenesis, a reproduction where unfertilised eggs hatch and develop in an adult from maternal genome only. This IS exciting for multiple reasons, but perhaps not as exiting for conservation of condors and I will try to explain why… It will take a bit of background on parthenogenesis and sex determination, but bear with me.
When I was young naive aspiring scientist I did not comprehend all the aspects of publishing. To be honest, I did not think about it much, but for me it’s the same as the climate change, it’s harder and harder to turn a blind eye. The last drop for me was the announcement of Nature’s Open Access option, it’s shocking €9,500, (or $11,390 / £8,290)! How did we come to this? Are we really going to let a private company to drain the already poor scholarly funds by these obscure amounts? And the problem is not just Nature…
About a year and half ago an article by John Tregoning was published in Nature News. The short piece was openly defending the prevalent usage of journal impact factor for evaluation of junior scientists for their sake. As a junior scientist I felt bitter. The publishing system is a huge academic problem we should do something about it! And as far as I know, young scientists are the loudest in pointing out new ways for less morally corrupted sharing of knowledge and therefore I find unfair a senior academic takes us, as an argument for keeping the status quo.
Leave a Comment